WebAug 9, 1996 · Research the case of Clohesy v. Food Circus Supermarkets, from the New Jersey Superior Court, 08-09-1996. AnyLaw is the FREE and Friendly legal research … WebOct 31, 2000 · In Clohesy v. Food Circus Supermarkets, Inc ., supra, 149 N.J. 496, for instance, the Supreme Court reversed summary judgment for a store-owner sued by executrix of customer who was abducted from the store's parking lot.
Zarwin Baum DeVito Kaplan Schaer Toddy, P.C.
WebIn Clohesy v. Food Circus Supermarkets, Inc., supra, 149 N.J. 496, for instance, the Supreme Court reversed summary judgment for a store-owner sued by executrix of customer who was abducted from the store's parking lot. WebMARY CLOHESY, Executrix of the Estate of KATHLEEN DALTON, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FOOD CIRCUS SUPERMARKETS, INC., t/a TWIN COUNTY GROCERS … bridgehead\\u0027s ho
Clohesy v. Food Circus Supermkts - Casetext
WebApr 24, 2024 · Acme Markets, Inc., 89 N.J. 270 (1982) and Clohesy v. Food Circus Supermarkets, Inc., 149 N.J. 496 (1997). Id. at 91-92. The Peguero panel noted that in Butler, it was reasonably foreseeable to the grocery store defendant that the plaintiff would be assaulted in the parking lot given seven prior muggings in the same location at the … WebOct 21, 1997 · Clohesy v. Food Circus Supermarkets, Inc., 149 N.J. 496, 502, 694 A.2d 1017 (1997). The key to the legal determination that a duty exists is based upon the foreseeability of the risk, the seriousness of the risk, and the “practicality of preventing it.” J.S. v. R.T.H., 155 N.J. 330, 339, 714 A.2d 924 (1998). WebJan 26, 1999 · Food Circus, Supermarkets. Inc., 293 N.J. Super. 217 , 679 A.2d 1230 (App.Div. 1996), ev'd, 149 N.J. 496 , 694 A.2d 1017 (1997). Butler and Clohesy both affirmed the well-established principle that the proprietor of a commercial establishment has a duty to use reasonable care to make the premises safe and to protect its patrons from … bridgehead\u0027s hp